Was the innkeeper really mean to Joseph, Mary?
G. Jeffrey MacDonald/Religion News Service
Issue date: 12/28/08 Section: Cover
|
But pageants and sermons castigating the infamous innkeeper are giving him an underserved bad rap, scholars say, and are feeding dangerous misconceptions about how Jesus' contemporaries received him.
"We're so brainwashed into this idea of the mean, old innkeeper and no room at the inn, we don't even notice that this is a violation of the text that we've just read," said Kenneth E. Bailey, a Bible scholar and author of "Jesus Through Middle Eastern Eyes."
The innkeeper's reputation stems from a single, oblique reference in Luke 2:7. The verse states that Mary wrapped the newborn Jesus in cloth "and laid him in a manger, because there was no room for them in the inn." From this text, Christian communities through the centuries have inferred that their savior was rebuffed at birth.
The reality was possibly much different. The "inn" (or "lodgings" in some translations) was not a hotel or hostel but perhaps a guest room in the private residence of one of Joseph's relatives, according to Mikeal Parsons, a Baylor University New Testament scholar who's writing a commentary on Luke. Because that room was already occupied, Parsons said, hosts may have made room for Mary and Joseph within their own family quarters and cleaned up an animal feeding trough (manger) to serve as a crib.
Such details are important, scholars say, in part because the birth narrative is rich with symbolism. The divine infant's portrayal in modest circumstances suggests, for instance, that God humbled himself to join the commonest of humankind. Hence for later generations to conjure a fictitious innkeeper and make him into something of a villain may be to read a new, unwarranted and potentially misleading significance into the story.
"It's kind of a 'gotcha' moment to recognize there is no innkeeper or reason to castigate an innkeeper, but that's what we tend to do," said Thomas Stegman, associate professor of New Testament at Boston College School of Theology and Ministry. "It's an easy thing to cast judgment on this figure, (but) anything that gives us an out from examining ourselves first is not a good thing in the spiritual life ... We need to consider instead how hospitable have we been?"
Surrounding the innkeeper's image is the question of who welcomed Jesus and who rejected him. Boston College theologian Harvey Egan notes that some Christian traditions have presumed an innkeeper's rudeness foreshadows Jesus' rejection by religious authorities on the eve of his death. Bailey cautions that Christians need to be careful not to let innkeeper legends perpetuate harmful stereotypes about Jews as people hostile toward Jesus or insensitive to the plight of a pregnant woman.
Be the first to comment on this story