Quantcast The District Chronicles
College Media Network

New VA hospital chaplain treatment under scrutiny

Mallika Rao/Religion News Service

Issue date: 9/28/08 Section: Divine Intervention
  • Print
  • Email
BALTIMORE - Vietnam veteran Raymond Ratajczak Jr. sat up in a cot at the Baltimore VA Medical Center in a room shared with three other patients. Every few minutes, his face wrinkled and he began to cry.

"What did we talk about earlier today, Raymond?" asked hospital chaplain Charles Thomas. Ratajczak looked up from his bed.

"So a man thinketh, so he be," Ratajczak said, paraphrasing Proverbs. Thomas smiled. "Think positive!"

Chaplains like Thomas are one of the newest treatment methods used by the Department of Veterans Affairs to treat the nation's veterans. They assess the spiritual and emotional health of veterans and report back to nurses and doctors, in hopes of developing a more "holistic" course of treatment.

Ratajczak, 63, has stage-four cancer. "I neglected my health for years," he said, his eyes welling up with tears.

Ratajczak was crying so hard he could no longer speak. His uncontrollable tears are a "reaction," Thomas explained, one provoked even when Ratajczak is not exactly sad. "Sometimes he's better," Thomas said. "But today he's not doing too well."

Such "spiritual assessments" are now routinely conducted on entering patients, though they are not mandatory. Critics, however, say the program runs afoul of the separation of church and state, and say a patient's "spiritual" health should have no bearing on his or her physical treatment.

"They're asking invasive questions, like how many times a day do you pray, and then they're evaluating them," said Annie Laurie Gaylor, founder of the Madison, Wis.-based Freedom From Religion Foundation. "If you don't pass the test, the answer is to give you more religion."

Gaylor's foundation recently lost a case against the VA when an appeals court in Madison rejected a challenge to the VA's use of religion in its health care practices. The ruling rested on a Supreme Court decision last year that said taxpayers lack standing in challenging the White House's Office of Faith-based and Community Initiatives.
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools

Be the first to comment on this story

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

Who's to blame for the recent "Underwear Bomber" security lapse?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement